Greenwood Village Premises Liability Lawyer

5-star rated on Google ABOTA trial advocate on the team Trial lawyers, not a settlement mill No fee unless we win

The Colorado Premises Liability Act (C.R.S. 13-21-115) controls every property injury in Greenwood Village. It sets the owner's duty based on your status at the time of injury: invitee, licensee, or trespasser. That status is the first thing an insurer disputes, and the first thing we establish.
Colorado's statute of limitations for most premises liability claims is two years from the date of injury (C.R.S. 13-80-102). If any Arapahoe County government entity owns or maintains the property, a separate written notice must be filed within 182 days of discovering the injury (C.R.S. 24-10-109(1)).
For claims accruing on or after January 1, 2025, non-economic damages such as pain and suffering are capped at $1.5 million (C.R.S. 13-21-102.5). Economic damages and compensation for physical impairment or disfigurement are never capped under Colorado law.

Greenwood Village combines one of Colorado's densest office park concentrations with a heavy retail footprint along Arapahoe Road and surrounding streets. DTC parking structures, office lobbies, restaurant walkways, and retail centers in Greenwood Plaza all carry ongoing premises exposure. Black ice on parking structures and walkways is a documented Greenwood Village hazard every winter. CGH Injury Lawyers serves Greenwood Village from our Denver office at 2701 Lawrence St., Suite 201. We represent people hurt on unsafe property in Arapahoe County with no upfront fees and a free first consultation. You pay nothing unless we win your case.

The governing law

What the Colorado Premises Liability Act means for your Greenwood Village claim

The Colorado Premises Liability Act, codified at C.R.S. 13-21-115, is the statute that decides whether a Greenwood Village property owner is legally responsible for your injury. It replaced older common-law rules with a structured framework that ties the owner's duty directly to why you were on the property and to what the owner knew or reasonably should have known about the dangerous condition.

The Act applies broadly to property across Greenwood Village: corporate office buildings and parking structures in the Denver Tech Center corridor, retail centers along Arapahoe Road, restaurants and hotels, apartment complexes, and common areas in mixed-use developments. It covers private owners and business entities alike, including landlords, commercial property managers, and corporate tenants who control premises. Government entities can also face premises liability claims in some situations, though the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act imposes its own caps and a strict pre-suit notice deadline.

Property owners in Greenwood Village do not bear unlimited liability, but they cannot ignore hazards that put visitors at risk. The central question in every premises case is whether the owner failed the legal duty the Act required given who you were and why you were there. That determination starts with your visitor status at the moment of injury.

Invitees: the highest protection under the Act

Invitees are people on the property for a purpose that benefits the owner or under an open public invitation. Customers in DTC retail shops, guests in Greenwood Village restaurants, visitors to corporate offices on behalf of a business, and hotel guests are all invitees. Property owners owe invitees the highest duty under C.R.S. 13-21-115: they must actively inspect for hazards and take reasonable steps to fix or warn about any dangerous conditions they find or should find through routine inspection. Waiting for a complaint is not enough.
Licensees: the duty to warn about known dangers

Licensees are on the property with the owner's permission but for their own purpose, such as a social guest at a private Greenwood Village residence. The duty for licensees is narrower: the owner must warn about dangers the owner actually knows about, but is not required to inspect for hidden hazards they are unaware of. The duty to warn does not require perfection, but it does require honest disclosure of known risks.
Trespassers: the minimum floor

Trespassers enter without permission and are owed very limited protection. Property owners in Greenwood Village cannot intentionally harm or set traps for trespassers, but they have no duty to inspect or warn. One important exception is the attractive-nuisance doctrine, which raises the duty when young children might be drawn to a dangerous feature such as a construction site, an unfenced decorative pond, or heavy equipment parked on a commercial property.

Status is not always fixed. An invitee who wanders into a restricted maintenance area of a DTC office building may lose that status. A visitor asked to leave who refuses can become a trespasser. Because insurers routinely challenge status to minimize the duty they must meet, establishing your classification with specific facts about why you were on the property is one of the first things we do.

Duty and notice

What the owner's duty of care actually requires in Greenwood Village

For invitees, reasonable care in Greenwood Village means active steps: regular safety inspections of parking structures and lobbies, prompt cleanup of spills and tracked-in water at building entrances, timely repair of broken pavers and handrails, adequate lighting in stairwells and parking decks, and snow and ice removal from walkways and ramps after a storm. Waiting for an incident report is not reasonable care for an invitee.

Constructive notice: when the owner should have known

Property owners in Greenwood Village frequently deny actual knowledge of the hazard that hurt you. Under Colorado law, actual knowledge is not the only standard. An owner can be liable for a danger they should have discovered through a reasonable inspection or monitoring program. That is constructive notice, and it is often the decisive concept in a premises case.

Duration matters. Ice that accumulated on a DTC parking deck overnight and remained through the morning rush is a very different case from a spill that appeared seconds before a fall. The longer a hazard exists, the stronger the constructive-notice argument.
Location matters. A broken floor tile at the main entrance to an Arapahoe Road office building is far more likely to carry constructive notice than one hidden in a rarely accessed service corridor.
Inspection records matter. DTC property managers who conduct regular safety sweeps have a documented inspection program as a defense. Owners who cannot produce inspection logs are often unable to prove they inspected at all, which supports constructive notice.
Recurring conditions matter. A Greenwood Village parking structure that floods at the entry point after every rainstorm has put its owners on notice of a foreseeable hazard, regardless of whether they receive a specific complaint after each event.

Colorado also recognizes weather-related duties. The ongoing-storm doctrine gives owners some protection while precipitation is actively falling, but once a storm ends, Greenwood Village property owners must clear walkways within a reasonable time. The city's 224 lane miles of roads require 24-hour plowing operations, and that level of recognized hazard means owners of private parking structures and walkways face a similar expectation. Letting ice remain for days after a winter event establishes constructive notice for purposes of civil liability.

DTC office and parking structure injuries

Ice and snow accumulation on parking deck ramps and pedestrian walkways connecting to office towers
Lobby and elevator vestibule slips from water tracked in on wet days
Broken or uneven pavers at building entrances and outdoor plazas
Insufficient lighting in parking structures that creates both slip-and-fall and negligent-security exposure
Defective handrails and stairwell conditions in multi-story office buildings

Retail, restaurant, and event venue injuries

Spills in Greenwood Plaza retail stores and restaurant aisles not cleaned within a reasonable time
Uneven or cracked outdoor walkways at shopping centers along Arapahoe Road
Negligent security at Fiddler's Green Amphitheatre events where high-capacity crowds create foreseeable assault risks
Potholes and deteriorated surfaces in private parking lots serving Arapahoe Road businesses
Inadequate crowd management or exit hazards at large events in the Arapahoe Road corridor

Negligent security is a premises liability claim. When a Greenwood Village property owner knows of prior criminal activity in or around their property, they may be required to provide working access controls, adequate lighting, functioning security cameras, or patrol services to protect invitees. A prior assault or theft on the premises is the clearest evidence that the owner had notice of a foreseeable threat and chose not to act. Cherry Creek State Park trail access points, where isolated paths meet parking areas, are one example of a location where a security analysis can matter for an injury claim.

Where your lawsuit is filed

Arapahoe County District Court (18th Judicial District)

Premises liability cases arising in Greenwood Village, an Arapahoe County municipality, that exceed the county-court jurisdictional limit are filed in the Arapahoe County District Court, part of Colorado's 18th Judicial District, located at 7325 S. Potomac Street, Centennial, CO 80112. The local procedural rules, the Arapahoe County jury pool, and the defense firms that regularly appear in this district all affect how a property injury case is handled. We practice in the 18th Judicial District and know what that courtroom demands.

Where injured Greenwood Village residents go

HCA HealthONE Swedish Medical Center and UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital

Seriously injured premises liability victims from Greenwood Village are commonly transported to HCA HealthONE Swedish Medical Center (501 East Hampden Avenue, Englewood, CO 80113), the closest Level I adult and pediatric trauma center, which also holds a Level I burn center designation. UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital (12505 E. 16th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045) serves as a second Level I Trauma Center for the metro area. Surgical records, emergency department notes, and rehabilitation records from these facilities form the foundation of your economic damages claim. We gather and organize those records as part of every case we take.

The property corridors with the most exposure

Denver Tech Center, Greenwood Plaza, Arapahoe Road, and Cherry Creek State Park

The Denver Tech Center is one of the largest suburban office park concentrations in Colorado, with tens of thousands of daily workers moving through parking structures, skybridge connections, and pedestrian pathways between buildings. Greenwood Plaza along Arapahoe Road (Colorado State Highway 88) concentrates retail, restaurant, and hotel foot traffic in a corridor that also handles event surges from Fiddler's Green Amphitheatre, an 18,000-capacity outdoor venue at the Arapahoe Road and I-25 interchange. Cherry Creek State Park, immediately east of the city, draws cyclists and recreational users to trail access points that cross back onto public and private property. Each of these environments generates its own pattern of premises exposure, and the owner responsible for maintaining it is the defendant in a successful claim.

Report the incident to property management immediately

Whether you fell in a DTC parking structure, a Greenwood Plaza store, or an office building lobby, ask for the property manager or building security and make sure an incident report is created before you leave. Request a copy. This report becomes a dated record that the hazard existed and that the owner was put on actual notice of it.
Document the hazard before it is fixed

Photograph the exact condition that caused your injury: ice on the ramp, the spilled liquid in the aisle, the broken paver at the building entrance, or the defective stair edge. Photograph the surrounding area to show what warning signs, if any, were present. Capture the lighting conditions. Get the names and phone numbers of any witnesses before they leave the scene.
Seek medical care without delay

For serious injuries from a Greenwood Village fall or assault, HCA HealthONE Swedish Medical Center (501 E. Hampden Avenue, Englewood) is the nearest Level I Trauma Center. See a physician even when injuries feel minor. Hip fractures, traumatic brain injuries, and spinal compression injuries from falls can be delayed in presentation. A gap between the incident and your first medical visit is one of the primary arguments insurers use to minimize your claim.
Do not give a recorded statement to the property owner's insurer

The insurer for the Greenwood Village property owner is working to limit what they pay you. Do not agree to a recorded statement, sign any document the insurer provides, or accept any offer before speaking with an attorney. Early settlement offers routinely arrive before you understand the full scope of your injuries or future medical costs.
Contact CGH Injury Lawyers before deadlines close your options

Most Greenwood Village premises liability claims carry a two-year filing deadline under C.R.S. 13-80-102. If a government entity owns or maintains the property, a written notice of claim must be filed within 182 days of discovering the injury under C.R.S. 24-10-109(1). We confirm your specific deadlines at the free consultation and begin evidence preservation immediately. Call (303) 209-9395.

Economic damages (no cap)

Emergency care and surgery, including trauma treatment at Swedish Medical Center
Ongoing medical treatment, specialist visits, and therapy
Future medical care costs, including long-term rehabilitation
Lost wages during recovery and any reduction in earning capacity
Out-of-pocket expenses directly caused by the injury

Non-economic damages (cap applies)

Pain and suffering
Emotional distress and mental anguish
Loss of enjoyment of life
Disability and loss of independence
In fatal cases, funeral costs and loss of companionship

Economic damages are never capped in Colorado. Non-economic damages such as pain and suffering are capped at $1.5 million for claims accruing on or after January 1, 2025, under C.R.S. 13-21-102.5. Compensation for physical impairment or disfigurement is entirely separate and not capped at all, which matters significantly when a premises fall produces a permanent hip fracture, a spinal compression injury, or scarring from a burn or laceration. In those cases, the uncapped physical impairment category often drives the largest part of the total recovery.

Colorado also follows a modified comparative negligence rule under C.R.S. 13-21-111. As long as you are found less than 50 percent at fault for your own injury, you can still recover. Your damages are reduced by your percentage of responsibility. Property owners and their insurers routinely argue that you were not watching where you were going, that the hazard was obvious, or that you assumed the risk. We challenge those arguments with evidence, not concessions.

"The hazard was open and obvious"

Colorado courts recognize an open-and-obvious defense but apply it narrowly. A hazard that is visible is not automatically a complete bar to recovery. When a dangerous condition exists in an area where invitees are reasonably expected to have their attention diverted, such as a DTC lobby where visitors are looking at signage or a retail store where customers are watching product displays rather than the floor, an owner who chose not to fix an unreasonably dangerous condition cannot escape liability simply because the hazard existed in daylight.
"We did not know about the condition"

Property managers of large DTC office buildings and parking structures often claim no actual knowledge of the specific hazard. We answer that argument with constructive notice: how long the condition existed, whether prior incidents occurred in the same location, whether the owner's inspection program would have found it in the ordinary course, and whether the owner can produce inspection logs showing regular checks were performed. Missing or incomplete logs frequently suggest inspections were not done, not that the hazard was absent.
"You were partly at fault" (comparative negligence)

Under C.R.S. 13-21-111, Colorado's modified comparative negligence rule, a property owner's insurer can reduce your recovery by arguing you share some fault. Common arguments are that you were distracted, wearing improper footwear, not using a handrail, or ignored a warning sign. Your award is reduced by your percentage of fault, and recovery is barred entirely at 50 percent or more. We build the facts that establish the owner's fault was predominant and that your conduct met a reasonable standard given the circumstances.
"You signed a waiver"

Event attendees, gym members, and participants in recreational activities at Greenwood Village venues sometimes sign liability waivers. Waivers can be enforceable under Colorado law when they are clear, specific, and mutual. They are generally not enforceable against claims arising from gross negligence or willful and wanton conduct. We evaluate every waiver in light of the specific facts before accepting that it closes a claim.

I wish I could leave more than 5 stars!

Grace M., 5-star CGH Injury Lawyers client review

Your team

The team handling your Greenwood Village premises liability case

CGH Injury Lawyers is a eight-attorney Colorado firm founded in 2016, formerly Cheney Galluzzi and Howard. Managing Partner Kevin Cheney is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA) and has tried over 25 cases to verdict. Timothy G. Tarr has been recognized by Best Lawyers every year since 2023. Every premises liability case for a Greenwood Village client is handled by a licensed Colorado attorney, not a paralegal.

Denver Office, Arapahoe County Cases

We serve Greenwood Village from Denver.

CGH Injury Lawyers does not have a Greenwood Village office. We serve Greenwood Village from our Denver office at 2701 Lawrence St., Suite 201. We file in Arapahoe County District Court and know the 18th Judicial District. The absence of a local storefront does not limit what we can do for your case.

ABOTA

Trial lawyers, not a settlement mill.

Managing Partner Kevin Cheney is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates and has tried over 25 cases to verdict. That record is why property-owner insurers respond differently to our demands.

Best Lawyers in America

Recognized every year since 2023.

Timothy G. Tarr has been recognized by Best Lawyers every year since 2023. Our eight-attorney team handles every Arapahoe County premises case from first contact through trial if needed.

Bilingual

Hablamos espanol.

Spanish-speaking staff and attorneys serve Arapahoe County's Spanish-speaking community. Premises liability claims are explained fully in both English and Spanish.

No Win, No Fee

Contingency only.

You pay nothing out of pocket for legal fees. We advance costs and collect only from a settlement or verdict in your Greenwood Village premises case.

ABOTA member on the team Tim Tarr: Best Lawyers in America since 2023 Over 25 cases to verdict Statewide Colorado coverage Bilingual EN / ES Free consultation No fee unless we win

Meet our attorneys

How long do I have to file a premises liability claim after a Greenwood Village property injury?

Most premises liability claims in Colorado must be filed within two years of the date of injury under C.R.S. 13-80-102. If any part of the property is owned or controlled by a government entity, a separate written notice of claim must be submitted within 182 days of the date you discovered the injury under C.R.S. 24-10-109(1). Missing that government notice deadline bars the claim entirely, long before the general two-year deadline would run. Get your specific deadline confirmed by an attorney as early as possible.

I slipped on ice in a Greenwood Village parking structure. Who is responsible?

Responsibility depends on who owned or controlled the parking structure and what duty that party owed you. If you were an invitee, such as a customer or an employee of a tenant, the owner had a duty to actively inspect for icy conditions and take reasonable steps to address them within a reasonable time after a storm ended. Colorado's ongoing-storm doctrine gives owners some protection while precipitation is actively falling, but once a storm passes, the duty to clear walkways and ramps is real. The length of time ice was present before your fall is the most important factual question.

Can I still recover if the property owner says I should have seen the hazard?

Often, yes. Colorado courts apply the open-and-obvious defense narrowly. Even when a hazard was visible, an owner can be liable if the condition was unreasonably dangerous or if it existed in a location where invitees were reasonably expected to be looking at something other than the floor, such as signage, displays, or a heavily trafficked DTC lobby entrance. The owner's failure to fix a dangerous condition is not excused simply because the condition could be seen. We analyze the specific facts of where and how the hazard existed before accepting an open-and-obvious argument.

Is there a cap on what I can recover in a Greenwood Village premises liability case?

Economic damages such as medical bills, lost wages, and future care costs are never capped in Colorado. For claims accruing on or after January 1, 2025, non-economic damages such as pain and suffering are capped at $1.5 million under C.R.S. 13-21-102.5. Compensation for physical impairment or disfigurement is not capped at all, which is critical in premises cases that result in permanent hip fractures, spinal injuries, or significant scarring. For many seriously injured Greenwood Village premises victims, the uncapped economic and physical impairment categories represent the most significant portion of the total recovery.

I was hurt at a Fiddler's Green Amphitheatre event. Do I have a premises claim?

Potentially, yes. Event attendees at a commercial venue are generally invitees, which means the venue owes the highest duty of care under C.R.S. 13-21-115. If your injury resulted from a hazardous condition the venue owner knew or should have known about, from inadequate crowd management, or from a foreseeable security failure at a high-capacity event, a premises claim may exist. Waivers on tickets are not always enforceable, particularly for injuries arising from the venue's own negligence. We evaluate the specific circumstances of your event injury, including what security and crowd measures were in place.

Does CGH Injury Lawyers have a Greenwood Village office?

No. CGH Injury Lawyers does not have a Greenwood Village office. We serve Greenwood Village and all of Arapahoe County from our Denver office at 2701 Lawrence St., Suite 201, Denver, CO 80205. We file in Arapahoe County District Court and handle the 18th Judicial District. You can reach us by phone at (303) 209-9395, and we offer free consultations for Greenwood Village premises liability victims.

Greenwood Village

Statewide Practice Area

South Metro Cities

Firm

Greenwood Village Premises Liability Lawyers Who Hold Property Owners Accountable

What the Colorado Premises Liability Act means for your Greenwood Village claim

The three visitor categories that determine a Greenwood Village owner's duty

Invitees: the highest protection under the Act

Licensees: the duty to warn about known dangers

Trespassers: the minimum floor

What the owner's duty of care actually requires in Greenwood Village

Constructive notice: when the owner should have known

The property injury patterns we see most often in the Greenwood Village area

DTC office and parking structure injuries

Retail, restaurant, and event venue injuries

Greenwood Village courts. Greenwood Village trauma care. Greenwood Village property corridors.

Arapahoe County District Court (18th Judicial District)

HCA HealthONE Swedish Medical Center and UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital

Denver Tech Center, Greenwood Plaza, Arapahoe Road, and Cherry Creek State Park

What to do after a premises injury in Greenwood Village

Report the incident to property management immediately

Document the hazard before it is fixed

Seek medical care without delay

Do not give a recorded statement to the property owner's insurer

Contact CGH Injury Lawyers before deadlines close your options

What compensation can you recover in a Greenwood Village premises liability case?

Economic damages (no cap)

Non-economic damages (cap applies)

Property owner defenses in Greenwood Village premises cases and how we answer them

"The hazard was open and obvious"

"We did not know about the condition"

"You were partly at fault" (comparative negligence)

"You signed a waiver"

The team handling your Greenwood Village premises liability case

We serve Greenwood Village from Denver.

Trial lawyers, not a settlement mill.

Recognized every year since 2023.

Hablamos espanol.

Contingency only.

Greenwood Village premises liability, frequently asked questions

Related pages

You were hurt on unsafe Greenwood Village property. We handle everything else.