ClickCease
Free consultations · Se habla espanol
Northglenn, Colorado. CGH Injury Lawyers represents skiers and snowboarders injured in Colorado ski accidents.
Northglenn, Colorado

Northglenn Ski Accident Lawyers, and 2 Addresses on Grant Street

Northglenn has an emergency department at 11900 Grant Street. A designated trauma center sits at 9191 Grant Street. Same road, and on the state's designated facility list only 1 of those 2 addresses carries a trauma designation. That distinction rarely matters to a person reading a discharge paper, and it matters a great deal to a claim built from those records months later. We handle Colorado Ski Safety Act claims from our Denver office at 2701 Lawrence St., and we charge no fee unless we win.

No fee unless we win
Call (303) 209-9395 Get my free ski accident case review

It's More Than Money.

Get my free ski accident case review

100% confidential. No fee unless we win.

Our Denver Office CGH Injury Lawyers 2701 Lawrence St., Suite 201 Denver, CO 80205 (303) 209-9395 Se habla espanol
5-star rated on Google ABOTA trial advocate on the team Trial lawyers, not a settlement mill 8 attorneys, bilingual EN / ES
  • Colorado runs ski injuries through a statute written for the sport before general negligence.
  • Lift injuries and injuries on the snow are handled under separate provisions, damages included.
  • A release is a contract, and a contract cannot excuse reckless or grossly negligent conduct.
  • Two years is the limit on both routes, from a different statute depending on the defendant.
  • The consultation is free, and the fee comes out of a recovery or not at all.
The law on the mountain

What the Colorado Ski Safety Act does to a ski injury claim

An ordinary injury case begins with the question of who was careless. A ski case begins with a statute, because Colorado legislated for the sport and courts work through that statute before common-law negligence. The Ski Safety Act of 1979, C.R.S. 33-44-101 and following, hands obligations to the ski area operator, hands obligations to the skier, and marks out a set of hazards nobody answers for.

That set is marked out at C.R.S. 33-44-103, and its reach is wide. Weather that changes. Snow in every condition it takes, listed as ice, hard pack, powder, crust, slush, cut-up snow, and machine-made snow. Conditions on and beneath the surface, meaning bare spots, forest growth, rocks, stumps, streambeds, cliffs, extreme terrain, and trees. Steepness that varies, whether nature made it or slope design, snowmaking, and grooming did. Impact with lift towers, signs, posts, fences, hydrants, water pipes, and other man-made structures. An injury inside that set belongs to the skier.

The section then limits itself in 2 respects, and those limits carry the claims that succeed. Inherent dangers and risks of skiing do not include the negligence of a ski area operator as set forth at C.R.S. 33-44-104(2). And nothing in the section limits an operator's liability for injury caused by the use or operation of ski lifts.

Because loose summaries of the Act are easy to find, 1 point belongs at the outset. The statute turns on the term "ski area" and on sliding downhill or jumping on snow or ice. It does not classify resorts by style of skiing, and it sets no helmet requirement for a skier at any age.

The critical distinction

The one question that decides most of the case

One classification made early governs most of what comes after. This is the split the statute makes.

Inherent dangers (no recovery)

  • Ice, hard pack, powder, crust, slush, cut-up snow, machine-made snow, and thin cover
  • Weather, and the visibility it leaves a skier with
  • Features the mountain already had: rocks, stumps, streambeds, cliffs, forest growth, trees
  • Steepness that changes, from nature or from slope design, snowmaking, and grooming
  • Contact with a lift tower, sign, post, fence, hydrant, or water pipe standing in its usual place

Operator negligence (recovery possible)

  • Lift breakdowns, mishandled loading, abrupt stops, riders dropped, unloading injuries
  • Signage the Act requires that was gone, wrong, or unreadable
  • Grooming or snowmaking machinery on an open run without the warning the statute requires
  • Man-made obstructions inside a skiing area left unpadded or unmarked
  • Careless conduct by patrollers, instructors, or other resort employees

Keep the first sorting open. A lift tower strike appears inherent and moves to the second column entirely if the padding required on that tower was absent. Ask the question before the file settles.

Skier duties and the downhill rule

Claims against another skier under C.R.S. 33-44-109

Where a fellow skier caused the injury, the statute leans toward the injured person. C.R.S. 33-44-109(1) provides that the risk of a skier-skier collision is neither an inherent risk nor a risk assumed by a skier in an action by one skier against another. The defense that finishes most claims against a resort is closed here, by the legislature's own words.

  1. Speed, course, and lookout

    A skier owes a duty to control speed and course at all times and to keep a proper lookout for other people and objects. Beyond that duty, the primary one falls on the person skiing downhill, the skier descending from above, to avoid collision with any person or object below them. Working out who held which position is where these cases are decided.

  2. Signs and closed trails

    Posted information and warnings are binding, and a run posted as closed may not be skied. The statute presumes a skier saw and understood the postings at base area lifts, on the tramways, and on the trails being used.

  3. Starting and joining

    Setting off from a stop, or entering a run from the side, brings a duty to avoid the skiers already descending.

  4. Devices for loose equipment

    Each ski or board needs a strap or comparable device able to stop it after a release. Cross country skis fall outside that requirement.

  5. Impairment, and leaving a collision

    Riding a lift or using a trail while impaired by alcohol or a controlled substance is barred, and so is leaving the vicinity of an injury collision without giving a name and current address to a resort employee or a patroller. Leaving to get aid is permitted, so long as the information follows.

  6. What the current penalties actually say

    The penalty subsection was rewritten and outdated copies are still in circulation, so precision is worth the sentence. C.R.S. 33-44-109(12)(a) makes it a civil infraction, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000, to violate the closed-trail provision, the impairment provision, or the provision on knowingly entering closed adjoining lands. C.R.S. 33-44-109(12)(b) makes leaving the scene of an injury collision a petty offense, a separate classification that sits outside that $1,000 group.

  7. Comparative fault

    Blame then gets apportioned. C.R.S. 13-21-111 permits recovery only where the claimant's negligence was not as great as the negligence of the party sued, and reduces the award by the claimant's share. When that share reaches half, recovery ends. Insurers know where the line falls, which is why the early version of a collision matters.

The truth about waivers

How much of a claim the release actually takes

Season passes, lift tickets, and rental forms in Colorado all carry a release. It is written to discourage, and it reaches less far than it sounds.

Colorado treats a release as a contract, so contract rules set its boundaries. The language must be clear and unambiguous, and it extends only to the conduct it names. A clause aimed at ordinary negligence covers ordinary negligence and stops.

The exclusions decide most cases. Willful and wanton conduct, recklessness, and gross negligence sit outside any release. Where a resort knew of a hazard and left it, skipped a required inspection, or kept running equipment it knew was defective, the paperwork does not answer the claim.

Minors have a separate rule. C.R.S. 13-22-107(3) permits a parent to release or waive a child's prospective negligence claim on the child's behalf, and subsection (4) provides that nothing in the section permits a parent to waive a child's claim for a willful and wanton act or omission, a reckless act or omission, or a grossly negligent act or omission.

The frequent error is reading the release alone and concluding it is finished. Bring it in and have it measured against the facts.

Local Knowledge

An emergency room in town, and no trauma designation on it

Trauma Care

The 2 Grant Street addresses

On the state health department's designated facility list, Northglenn holds an emergency department and no designated trauma center.

Both sit on Grant Street. One is a hospital-operated emergency department and the other is a designated trauma center, and the distinction is not visible from the sign out front or from the street.

That is worth understanding, and it is not cause for alarm. A non-designated emergency department is a real emergency department. It treats emergencies, it is staffed to do so, and for most injuries it is exactly the right place to go. What a trauma designation describes is a different and narrower thing: the surgical and specialty coverage a hospital maintains for major trauma, verified by the state. A patient whose injuries call for that level of care is transferred to a facility that holds it.

  • Intermountain Health Saint Joseph Hospital Emergency, Northglenn, 11900 Grant Street. Listed as not designated.
  • HCA HealthONE Mountain Ridge, 9191 Grant Street, Thornton. Designated Level II.

The Corridor

Why this shapes a ski claim

A skier hurt in the mountains and brought back to the north metro can easily generate a record with more institutions in it than they remember.

The claim is built from those records, and 2 practical problems come out of the sequence. The first is completeness: no institution produces a combined file, so records are requested from each one separately and each releases on its own schedule. The second is interpretation. The earliest independent measure of how badly someone was hurt is usually the arrival assessment at whichever facility received them, and reading that correctly means knowing what kind of facility it was.

Anyone assembling their own timeline should confirm the actual facility name and address at each stage instead of working from memory or from a single discharge summary. Two addresses on the same street are easy to conflate a year later.

Trauma Care

Adams County holds 3 designated levels, none of them here

Northglenn is in Adams County. The county's designated facilities on the state list run across 3 cities and 3 levels:

A Level III facility receives, stabilizes, and transfers onward. A Level II has the coverage for definitive care in major trauma. A Level I sits at the top of the state system. Where a patient lands among those depends on the injury, the transport available, and clinical judgment at the time, not on which one is nearest.

  • Level I, UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital on the Anschutz campus at 12605 E. 16th Avenue.
  • Level II, HCA HealthONE Mountain Ridge at 9191 Grant Street in Thornton.
  • Level III, Intermountain Health Platte Valley Hospital at 1600 Prairie Center Parkway in Brighton.

Venue

County and court

Adams County belongs to the 17th Judicial District, which it shares with the City and County of Broomfield. District matters are handled at the Adams County Justice Center, 1100 Judicial Center Drive, in Brighton.

For a ski claim that courthouse is usually not the destination. Venue in these cases generally follows the resort and the site of the injury, and Adams County contains no ski area. From the north metro the resorts closest along I-70 are in Clear Creek County, which is in the 5th Judicial District together with Eagle, Lake, and Summit counties, while a trip up Boulder Canyon ends at Eldora in Boulder County, the 20th Judicial District. Which road was taken is what normally sets the venue.

Compensation

What an injured Northglenn skier may be able to recover

With negligence established, Colorado divides the losses into those backed by documents and those that are not.

Economic damages

  • Evacuation from the mountain, air transport included where it was necessary
  • Emergency care, surgery, and specialist treatment through discharge
  • Income lost during recovery, and earning capacity lost afterward
  • Physical and occupational rehabilitation
  • Treatment still ahead, with a life care plan where the injury supports one
  • Costs the household paid directly because of the injury

Non-economic damages

  • Pain and suffering after orthopedic, spinal, or head trauma
  • Permanent impairment, or physical function that does not come back
  • Loss of enjoyment of life, the sport included
  • In a death case, funeral expenses and the loss of companionship

The operator cap, and the lift exception inside it

Statute caps what a ski area operator can be made to pay. C.R.S. 33-44-113 sets a total ceiling of $1,000,000 present value, holds any derivative claim by another claimant to $250,000, and holds non-economic loss to $250,000. Four features of the section decide how it applies.

  • Injuries occurring to a passenger while riding on a passenger tramway are excluded from the cap by the statute's own terms, which is why a chairlift case is analyzed apart from an injury on the snow.
  • The ceiling reaches operators only. A claim against the skier who caused a collision falls outside it.
  • On good cause shown a court may award above the ceiling, limited to excess future lost earnings or excess future medical and other health-care costs, and only where the limit would be unfair.
  • The limits and the exceptions to them are not disclosed to the jury.
Deadlines and fault

Two years, from whichever statute fits the defendant

Two years applies on both routes, and the statute that supplies it turns on the defendant.

Against a ski area operator or its employees, where the damages came from the maintenance, supervision, or operation of a passenger tramway or a ski area, C.R.S. 33-44-111 applies and requires the action to be brought within 2 years after the claim for relief arises. Its language addresses operators, so it does not govern a claim against another skier. That deadline comes from C.R.S. 13-80-102(1)(a), the general 2-year limit on tort actions.

The start date is governed separately. C.R.S. 13-80-108(1) provides that a cause of action accrues on the date both the injury and its cause are known or should have been known through reasonable diligence. In most ski crashes that is the day of the crash. The provision is written in discovery terms because certain injuries, head and spine trauma above all, become clear only over time. Waiting to learn how bad the harm is does not buy more time.

Fault runs on its own calculation. C.R.S. 13-21-111 allows recovery while the claimant's negligence stays under that of the party sued, cuts the award by the claimant's share, and ends recovery at an even split. Insurers work toward that threshold, and the account that holds a claimant clear of it comes from witnesses and records gathered in the first weeks.

Why CGH

Why injured Northglenn skiers choose CGH Injury Lawyers

Trial-Ready

Built for trial.

A file put together as though a jury will read it carries a different value in negotiation.

The Statute

Ski claims run on their own rules.

Inherent risk, the duties in 33-44-109, the operator cap, and release language behave nothing like ordinary negligence.

Fast Evidence Action

Proof expires.

Lift maintenance logs, grooming records, incident reports, patrol notes, and the condition of signage all change or disappear. Preservation demands go out early.

No Win, No Fee

No fee unless we win.

The consultation costs nothing and the fee comes from a recovery. Case costs are set out in the fee agreement before signing.

Local Reach

Every facility in the chain gets named.

Where 2 emergency addresses sit on the same street and only 1 holds a designation, the file records which one treated you at each stage.

How it works

How we handle a Northglenn ski accident case

  1. Free consultation.

    Describe what happened and get a direct answer about whether a claim exists, including when the answer is no.

  2. Preservation.

    Written demands reach the resort for lift logs, grooming records, incident reports, and video before retention windows close.

  3. Investigation.

    Witnesses are located, patrol and clinic records obtained, and where the mechanism of injury is disputed an accident reconstruction expert is retained.

  4. Medical picture.

    Records are collected from every facility in the chain, and in serious cases treating physicians and life care planners set out what recovery requires.

  5. Demand and negotiation.

    The claim is presented with its evidence attached.

  6. Litigation where needed.

    Where the offer falls short of the harm, suit is filed in the correct venue and the case is worked up for trial.

5-star rated on Google

I wish I could leave more than 5 stars!

Grace Macaluso, 5-star Google review
Questions

Northglenn ski accident, frequently asked questions

Is there a trauma center in Northglenn?

No. The state health department's designated facility list shows an emergency department here, Intermountain Health Saint Joseph Hospital Emergency at 11900 Grant Street, and records it as not designated. A designated center appears on that list further down the same road, HCA HealthONE Mountain Ridge at 9191 Grant Street in Thornton, designated Level II.

Both are on Grant Street. Are they related?

They are separate facilities operated by different health systems, at different addresses on the same road. Confirming which address treated you matters when records are requested later.

Does a non-designated emergency room mean lesser care?

No. It is a real emergency department, staffed to treat emergencies, and for most injuries it is the right place. A trauma designation describes something narrower: the surgical and specialty coverage a hospital maintains for major trauma, verified by the state. A patient who needs that level is transferred to a facility holding it.

Why does the difference matter to my claim?

Because the claim is built from records. A transfer produces a chart at the first facility, a transport record, and a second chart at the receiving hospital, each released separately. The earliest independent measure of how badly you were hurt is usually the arrival assessment, and reading it correctly means knowing what kind of facility wrote it.

What are the designated facilities in Adams County?

Three, across 3 cities and 3 levels. UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital on the Anschutz campus is Level I, HCA HealthONE Mountain Ridge in Thornton is Level II, and Intermountain Health Platte Valley Hospital in Brighton is Level III.

Which judicial district is Northglenn in?

The 17th, which covers Adams County and the City and County of Broomfield. District matters are handled at the Adams County Justice Center, 1100 Judicial Center Drive, in Brighton.

Would my ski case be heard in Brighton?

Usually not. Venue generally follows the resort and the place of injury, and Adams County contains no ski area, so the claim is normally litigated in the mountain county where the crash happened.

Which mountain county would that be?

It depends on the route. The resorts closest along I-70 are in Clear Creek County, in the 5th Judicial District with Eagle, Lake, and Summit counties. A trip up Boulder Canyon ends at Eldora in Boulder County, which is the 20th Judicial District.

Does the release on my pass end my claim?

Not on its own. Colorado reads a release as a contract, so it reaches only the conduct it clearly names. It cannot cover willful and wanton conduct, recklessness, or gross negligence, and under C.R.S. 13-22-107(4) a parent cannot waive a child's claim for conduct in those categories.

Another skier hit me. Is that just part of the sport?

Not in a claim between skiers. C.R.S. 33-44-109(1) provides that a skier-skier collision is neither an inherent risk nor a risk assumed in an action by one skier against another, and the statute puts the primary duty on the person skiing downhill, the skier coming from above, to avoid people and objects below them.

I was hurt on a chairlift. Is that treated differently?

It can be. C.R.S. 33-44-103 states that nothing in the inherent-risk definition limits an operator's liability for injury caused by the use or operation of ski lifts, and C.R.S. 33-44-113 excludes injuries occurring to a passenger while riding on a passenger tramway from the damages cap.

How long do I have?

2 years. Against a ski area operator or its employees the deadline comes from C.R.S. 33-44-111, and against another skier from C.R.S. 13-80-102(1)(a). The period generally starts once both the injury and its cause were known or reasonably should have been known.

Is there a cap on what I can recover?

Against a ski area operator, yes. C.R.S. 33-44-113 sets $1,000,000 present value overall, with $250,000 on derivative claims and on non-economic loss. Passenger tramway injuries are excluded, the cap does not apply to a claim against another skier, and a court may exceed it on good cause shown for excess future earnings or future medical costs.

Do I have to wear a helmet in Colorado?

The Ski Safety Act imposes no helmet requirement at any age. Wearing one is sensible, and it is not what decides whether a claim exists.

What if I was partly at fault?

Recovery remains available while your negligence stays below the other party's, with the award reduced by your share. At half or more, C.R.S. 13-21-111 ends recovery, which is why an early account of fault is worth challenging.

What will this cost me?

Nothing to start. The consultation is free, and the fee is taken only from a recovery. How case costs are handled is set out in the fee agreement before you sign.

Keep Reading

Related pages

Northglenn

Practice Area

Firm

Get Help

It's More Than Money.

You were hurt on the mountain. We handle everything else.

Call (303) 209-9395 or request a free case review. No fee unless we win.

Call (303) 209-9395 Get my free ski accident case review

Prefer to read first? See how Colorado's Ski Safety Act works.

CGH Injury Lawyers · 2701 Lawrence St., Suite 201, Denver, CO 80205

Attorney Advertising. CGH Injury Lawyers.