What Determines a Denver Spinal Cord Injury Settlement?

There is no reliable average settlement for a spinal cord injury in Denver, and the reason is not secrecy. Settlements are private agreements, no Colorado agency compiles them, and the figures that reach the public are the unusual ones.

An average would be close to meaningless here even if the data existed. Spinal cord injuries range from an incomplete injury someone largely recovers from to a high cervical injury requiring ventilator support and round-the-clock attendant care for the rest of a life. Averaging those produces a number that describes no actual person.

What can be described precisely is the machinery Colorado law applies to any spinal cord injury claim. Some damages are capped by statute. Some are not, and in catastrophic injury cases the uncapped category is usually the one that decides the outcome. Fault percentages can reduce whatever is established. Insurance often sets a lower practical ceiling than the law does.

This article explains those forces. If you want your own circumstances looked at, CGH Injury Lawyers is based in Denver and handles catastrophic injury claims across Colorado. You can contact our office or call (303) 209-9395.

The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always consult a licensed attorney for advice specific to your situation.

Past results do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes in future cases. Each case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts.

Table of Contents

1. Why an Average Is Misleading in Spinal Cord Cases
2. What Colorado Caps, and What It Leaves Alone
3. Future Care Is Usually the Number That Decides the Case
4. How Fault Percentages Cut the Figure
5. Why Insurance Often Sets the Real Ceiling
6. The Deadline Depends on How the Injury Happened
7. Talk to a Denver Spinal Cord Injury Attorney
8. Frequently Asked Questions

Key Takeaways

• Colorado caps noneconomic damages, not economic ones. For civil actions filed on or after January 1, 2025, the noneconomic cap is $1.5 million, adjusted for inflation from January 1, 2028.
• Medical care, equipment, home modification and lost earning capacity sit outside that cap. In a severe spinal cord case these routinely dwarf the capped category.
• Future care has to be proved, not assumed. A life care plan, with medical and economic testimony behind it, is how a lifetime of need becomes a recoverable figure.
• Fault is measured as a percentage, and recovery is barred entirely where the injured person’s share is as great as the other party’s.
• The filing deadline depends on what caused the injury. Three years for motor vehicle claims, two years for most others, and 182 days where a public entity is involved.

Why an Average Is Misleading in Spinal Cord Cases

Every serious injury claim resists averaging. Spinal cord injuries resist it more than most, because the clinical range is so wide that two claims sharing a diagnosis can have almost nothing else in common.

Level and completeness drive nearly everything. An incomplete injury low on the spine, with meaningful motor function preserved, produces a different life and a different claim from a complete injury high in the cervical spine. Age at injury matters, because a lifetime of care costs more for someone injured at twenty-five than at sixty-five. Pre-injury earnings matter, because lost earning capacity is calculated against what the person was actually on course to earn.

None of that is captured by a single figure. A published average sits somewhere between two very different realities and misrepresents both. For a family trying to judge whether an offer is reasonable, an anchor drawn from the wrong end of the range is worse than no anchor at all.

Colorado is also a state where severe spinal cord injuries are treated locally rather than out of state. Craig Hospital, in Colorado, is one of the federally designated Spinal Cord Injury Model System centers funded through the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research, and operates the Rocky Mountain Regional Spinal Injury System. Care of that intensity generates records and cost histories that a properly built claim relies on.

What Colorado Caps, and What It Leaves Alone

Colorado sorts damages into two categories and treats them very differently. In a catastrophic case, the distinction is the most consequential thing in the statute book.

Noneconomic damages cover harm with no invoice. Colorado’s statute defines noneconomic loss or injury as “nonpecuniary harm for which damages are recoverable by the person suffering the direct or primary loss or injury, including pain and suffering, inconvenience, emotional stress, and impairment of the quality of life.”

These are capped. House Bill 24-1472, approved June 3, 2024 and effective January 1, 2025, raised the limit substantially. The Colorado General Assembly’s official summary states that the act “increases the cap on damages for noneconomic loss or injury from $250,000 to $1.5 million” for civil actions filed on or after January 1, 2025, and that “starting January 1, 2028, and every 2 years thereafter,” the cap adjusts for inflation.

Economic damages are not subject to that cap. Past and future medical treatment, surgery, rehabilitation, attendant care, durable medical equipment, home and vehicle modification, medication, lost wages and lost earning capacity all sit outside it.

That asymmetry is why spinal cord cases are argued the way they are. In a moderate injury claim, pain and suffering can be the largest component and the cap is the ceiling that matters. In a severe spinal cord injury, the lifetime cost of care will normally exceed the noneconomic cap by a wide margin, and that portion of the claim has no statutory limit at all.

Two limits on the above are worth stating plainly. Wrongful death claims are governed by their own statute with its own cap, and medical malpractice claims by another, on a separate and lower schedule. The general figure does not describe every case type. Which cap applies to a particular claim depends on the claim’s own timing, so it is worth confirming rather than assuming.

Future Care Is Usually the Number That Decides the Case

Because economic damages are uncapped, the central work in a spinal cord claim is establishing what the future actually costs, and establishing it to a standard that survives challenge.

That is a matter of proof, not assertion. It normally involves a life care plan prepared by a qualified professional, medical testimony on prognosis and expected complications, and economic testimony converting a schedule of future costs into a present value.

The categories that typically appear include attendant or nursing care, replacement of wheelchairs and other equipment on a repeating cycle, home modification, accessible transport, ongoing therapy, medication, and the treatment of secondary conditions that follow a spinal cord injury over time.

An insurer will contest the plan rather than the diagnosis: the hours of care assumed, the replacement intervals, the life expectancy used, the discount rate applied. Those arguments are where a very large part of the eventual number is won or lost, and they are the reason a settlement figure that sounds substantial can still fall short of what a lifetime of care will cost.

A figure only means something set against what your future actually requires. Call (303) 209-9395 or request a case evaluation to discuss how that assessment works.

Our spinal cord injury page covers the cost side in more detail, and our catastrophic injury page covers how these claims are handled.

How Fault Percentages Cut the Figure

Colorado applies modified comparative negligence. Contributory negligence does not bar recovery “if such negligence was not as great as the negligence of the person against whom recovery is sought, but any damages allowed shall be diminished in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to the person for whose injury, damage, or death recovery is made.”

Two effects follow. Damages are reduced by the injured person’s percentage of fault. And where that percentage equals or exceeds the other party’s, the statute directs the court to enter judgment for the defendant, so recovery is lost entirely.

We have covered the rule in more general terms in our post on whether Colorado is a comparative negligence state. In a case where future care runs to seven figures, a shift of ten percentage points in the fault allocation moves a very large amount of money. That is why liability is contested as hard as damages in catastrophic claims, and why evidence gathered early tends to matter more here than anywhere else.

Why Insurance Often Sets the Real Ceiling

A claim’s legal value and the money actually available are different things.

Where the injury arose from a motor vehicle collision, Colorado requires drivers to carry liability coverage of at least “$25,000 to any one person in any one accident” and “$50,000 to all persons in any one accident.” Against a lifetime of spinal cord injury care, a minimum policy is exhausted almost immediately.

This is why uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage matters so much in catastrophic cases. Colorado requires insurers to offer UM/UIM coverage in an amount equal to the insured’s bodily injury liability limits, and a named insured may reject it. Where it was carried, it is frequently the largest available source of recovery.

Serious cases also turn on finding every applicable policy: commercial coverage, umbrella policies, employer coverage where a vehicle was being driven for work, or premises coverage where the injury happened on someone’s property. Identifying available coverage is often more consequential to the outcome than any argument about value.

The Deadline Depends on How the Injury Happened

There is no single spinal cord injury deadline in Colorado, because the limitation period follows the cause rather than the injury.

Where the injury arose from a motor vehicle, Colorado applies a three-year period to “all tort actions for bodily injury or property damage arising out of the use or operation of a motor vehicle.”

Most other tort claims, including falls and general negligence, must be commenced “within two years after the cause of action accrues.”

Where a public entity is involved, the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act requires written notice “within one hundred eighty-two days after the date of the discovery of the injury,” and compliance “shall be a jurisdictional prerequisite to any action brought under the provisions of this article, and failure of compliance shall forever bar any such action.”

A person spending months in acute care and inpatient rehabilitation can pass the 182-day mark without ever being told it existed. Where any public entity might be involved, that date should be established immediately.

We have written in more detail about how long after an accident you can sue in Denver.

Talk to a Denver Spinal Cord Injury Attorney

The question behind “what is the average settlement” is usually a more practical one: is the number in front of me enough, and what am I giving up by accepting it. That question is answerable, but only against a particular set of facts: the injury level, the life care plan, the fault dispute, and the coverage that exists.

CGH Injury Lawyers is a Denver personal injury firm founded in 2016, based at 2701 Lawrence St., Suite 201. Our attorneys handle spinal cord injury and catastrophic injury claims throughout Colorado, including wrongful death matters.

Call (303) 209-9395 or request a case evaluation to discuss your situation with a Colorado spinal cord injury attorney.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average settlement for a spinal cord injury in Denver?

No reliable average exists. Settlements are private, are not reported to any Colorado agency, and vary enormously with injury level and completeness, age, earning capacity, fault allocation and available insurance. A figure presented as a Denver average is not drawn from a verifiable dataset.

Does Colorado cap what I can recover for a spinal cord injury?

Colorado caps noneconomic damages such as pain and suffering. For civil actions filed on or after January 1, 2025, that cap is $1.5 million, with inflation adjustments beginning January 1, 2028. Economic damages, including medical care, equipment, home modification and lost earning capacity, are not subject to that cap. Wrongful death and medical malpractice claims are governed by separate statutes, and which cap applies to a particular claim depends on its timing.

How is future care calculated in a spinal cord injury claim?

Future care is generally established through a life care plan prepared by a qualified professional, supported by medical testimony on prognosis and economic testimony converting future costs to present value. The assumptions in that plan are routinely contested by the opposing side.

Can I still recover if I was partly at fault?

Possibly. Colorado reduces damages in proportion to the injured person’s share of negligence and bars recovery where that share is as great as the other party’s. How fault is allocated depends on the evidence and is frequently disputed.

What if the at-fault driver had minimum insurance?

Colorado’s minimum bodily injury liability coverage is $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident, which a catastrophic injury exhausts quickly. Uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage on the injured person’s own policy may provide an additional source of recovery, depending on the policy terms. Other applicable policies may also exist.

How long do I have to bring a spinal cord injury claim in Colorado?

It depends on the cause. Motor vehicle claims carry a three-year period; most other tort claims must be commenced within two years of accrual. Where a public entity is involved, written notice must be filed within 182 days of discovering the injury, and that requirement is jurisdictional.

Written by CGH Injury Lawyers.

Last updated: August 31, 2026.

Attorney Advertising. CGH Injury Lawyers.