Can You Sue Someone for Injuring You While Skiing in Denver? How a Ski Accident Lawsuit Works in Colorado

The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always consult a licensed attorney for advice specific to your situation.

Who You Can Sue Depends on What Caused the Crash

If you live in Denver and ski in the mountains, the same state law applies at every Colorado ski area. The Ski Safety Act of 1979 says it exists to “define the rights and liabilities existing between the skier and the ski area operator and between skiers” (C.R.S. 33-44-102).

That gives you three possible paths, plus one where the law generally leaves the risk with you. A single crash can touch more than one:

What caused the injury	Who may be responsible	The rule that shapes it
Another skier or snowboarder hit you	That skier	Skier duties in C.R.S. 33-44-109
A resort broke a duty the Act imposes.	The ski area operator	C.R.S. 33-44-104 and the resort duties in 33-44-106 to -108
A lift, gondola, or tow malfunctioned.	The ski area operator	Lift operations sit outside the inherent risk shield, C.R.S. 33-44-103
Snow, trees, rocks or terrain	Generally no one	Inherent dangers, C.R.S. 33-44-112

The Act also says a violation of any of its requirements “shall, to the extent such violation causes injury to any person or damage to property, constitute negligence on the part of the person violating such requirement” (C.R.S. 33-44-104). That rule applies to skiers and resorts alike.

Suing Another Skier After a Collision

A skier-on-skier crash is the clearest path to a ski accident lawsuit. The Act says a skier is not precluded “from suing another skier for any injury to person or property resulting from such other skier’s acts or omissions.” It also says the risk of a collision “is neither an inherent risk nor a risk assumed by a skier in an action by one skier against another” (C.R.S. 33-44-109).

The same section lists what every skier owes the people around them. A skier who breaks one of these duties and hurts you may be responsible for your injuries:

• Control and lookout. Each skier has to keep control of speed and course “at all times” and maintain “a proper lookout so as to be able to avoid other skiers and objects.”
• The skier above has the primary duty. In the Act’s words, “the primary duty shall be on the person skiing downhill to avoid collision with any person or object below him.” In plain terms, the person coming down from above has to avoid the people below.
• Starting and merging. A skier starting from a stop or entering a trail from the side has “the duty of avoiding moving skiers already on the ski slope or trail.”
• No impaired skiing. No one may use a slope while impaired by alcohol or drugs.
• Stay after a collision. A skier involved in an injury collision may not leave before giving a name and current address to a resort employee or ski patrol, except to obtain help for the injured person, and then must give it afterward.

Those duties come from subsections (2), (8), (9) and (10) of C.R.S. 33-44-109. You bring a claim against another skier personally, and whether an insurance policy responds depends on the policies involved.

Can You Sue a Ski Resort in Colorado?

You can sue a ski resort in Colorado in some situations, but the set a clear limitine first. It says that “no skier may make any claim against or recover from any ski area operator for injury resulting from any of the inherent dangers and risks of skiing” (C.R.S. 33-44-112).

The definition of those inherent dangers is broad. It includes:

• Changing weather and snow conditions, including ice, powder, and machine-made snow
• Bare spots, stumps, streambeds, cliffs, trees, and other natural objects
• Impact with lift towers, signs, posts, fences, hydrants, and other man-made structures
• Variations in terrain, including terrain parks and features built through grooming
• Collisions with other skiers, as between you and the resort
• A skier’s failure to ski within their abilities

That list comes from C.R.S. 33-44-103(3.5). The same definition sets two limits on the operator’s liability. It “does not include the negligence of a ski area operator as set forth in section 33-44-104 (2),” and nothing in it limits the operator’s liability “for injury caused by the use or operation of ski lifts.”

So a resort claim looks for a duty the resort broke: the Act requires resorts to post specific signs and markings (C.R.S. 33-44-106), to put a light on moving grooming machines, and to post notice at the top of a trail while grooming equipment works on it during open hours (C.R.S. 33-44-107, 33-44-108). The Act also limits resort duties in two ways. A resort has no duty, as an operator, to anyone skiing beyond its marked boundaries, and its power to pull a reckless skier’s pass doesn’t create a duty to protect you from other skiers (C.R.S. 33-44-108(4), (5)).

Chairlift and Gondola Injuries

The inherent risk definition expressly doesn’t limit an operator’s liability for injuries from “the use or operation of ski lifts” (C.R.S. 33-44-103). A violation of a rule of the state’s passenger tramway safety board also counts as negligence by the operator to the extent it causes injury (C.R.S. 33-44-104(2)).

Riders have duties too. A passenger has to follow the lift instructions given, may not board or alight on or off except at a designated area outside an emergency or a stoppage supervised by the operator, and may not act in a way that interferes with safe operation (C.R.S. 33-44-105). How those duties played out on the day of your injury is part of the claim.

Does a Lift Ticket Waiver End a Ski Accident Lawsuit?

If you signed or accepted a release with your ticket or pass, a 2024 ruling matters. In Miller v. Crested Butte, LLC, 2024 CO 30, the Colorado Supreme Court reviewed claims brought for a minor left a quadriplegic by a chair lift accident, and it split the family’s claims in two.

• Statutory duties survive the release. The court said “a party cannot discharge its obligation to perform a statutory duty by way of an exculpatory agreement,” and it ordered the claim based on violations of the Ski Safety Act, the Passenger Tramway Safety Act and their regulations reinstated.
• An ordinary negligence claim can be barred. The court also held that “the release agreements that Miller signed are enforceable and thus bar” the family’s separate claim for negligence under a highest duty of care.

Both quotes are from the Miller opinion. The court expressed no opinion on whether the reinstated claim would succeed. What the ruling means for you depends on the exact release you signed and on which duties the resort may have broken.

Limits on What a Resort Can Be Made to Pay

The Act caps what a skier can recover from a ski area operator. It sets these limits in C.R.S. 33-44-113:

Part of the recovery	Limit
Total damages from the ski area operator	$1,000,000, present value
Noneconomic loss, such as pain and suffering	$250,000 within that total
A derivative claim by another person, such as a spouse	$250,000 within that total
Injury to a passenger riding a lift	Excluded from these limits

The statute gives a court room to go above the total in one narrow case. If future lost earnings or future medical costs push the damages past the cap and applying it “would be unfair,” the court may award more, but only for those excess future earnings or medical costs. The law also says a jury isn’t told about the cap.

These limits apply to the resort. A claim against another skier falls under Colorado’s general damages rules instead, including a $1.5 million limit on noneconomic damages for claims that accrue on or after January 1, 2025 (C.R.S. 13-21-102.5). A claim can include medical costs, lost income, and pain and suffering, and our overview of the types of damages in a Colorado personal injury case explains each one.

How Your Share of Fault Is Counted

In a claim against another skier, Colorado’s comparative negligence rule applies. The statute lets a skier who was partly careless still recover “if such negligence was not as serious as the negligence of the person against whom recovery is sought,” and that skier’s damages are “diminished in proportion” to their share (C.R.S. 13-21-111).

A resort claim works differently for inherent risks. The Act’s bar on those claims applies “notwithstanding” the comparative negligence statute, so comparative fault doesn’t reopen a claim barred by the Act (C.R.S. 33-44-112). Our explainer on whether Colorado is a comparative negligence state walks through the general rule.

Deadlines for a Colorado Ski Accident Claim

Two statutes set the clock, depending on who you’re suing:

Claim	Deadline	Source
Against a ski area operator or its employees, for the maintenance, supervision or operation of a lift or ski area	Two years after the claim arises	C.R.S. 33-44-111
Against another skier, as a negligence claim	Generally two years	C.R.S. 13-80-102

Different timing rules can apply when the injured skier is a minor (C.R.S. 13-81-103), so confirm the dates in your case with a lawyer early. For the wider picture, see our guide to the Colorado personal injury statute of limitations.

What to Do After a Colorado Ski Accident

These steps help protect your health and a possible Colorado ski accident claim:

1. Get medical care. Let ski patrol help you off the hill, and see a doctor even if you walked away.
2. Get the other skier’s name and address. The Act requires a skier in an injury collision to provide a name and current address to ski patrol or a resort employee, so ask patrol to take it down (C.R.S. 33-44-109(10)).
3. Ask for the ski patrol report. Write down the patrollers’ names and the time and place of the crash.
4. Photograph the scene. Capture the trail sign, the run, any lift or equipment involved, and your gear.
5. Collect witnesses. Get names and phone numbers of anyone who saw the crash.
6. Keep your ticket or pass and any release. The exact wording of the release can affect a resort claim.
7. Hold on to your gear. Don’t repair or throw away skis, bindings, a helmet, or a board that may show what happened.

How We Look at a Ski Accident Case

The first question in a ski case is what caused the injury. A collision with another skier, a grooming machine on an open run, a missing closure sign and a lift malfunction each lead to a different set of rules, a different defendant, and, for a resort, a cap.

Then we gather the records that can disappear first:

• The ski patrol incident report
• Witness names and contact details
• Trail, signage, and closure details from the day
• Lift or grooming records the resort keeps

If you were treated in Denver after a mountain injury, your medical records from every provider help show the full effect of the injury. Our pages on Colorado brain injury claims and Colorado spinal cord injury claims explain how those injuries are documented.

If Spanish is easier for you, the line to use is (303) 835-9177. Ask about fees when you call.

Talk to a Denver Ski Accident Lawyer

If another skier or a resort’s failure left you hurt, a Denver ski accident lawyer can look at the facts, the release, and the deadlines with you. Our Colorado ski accident injury page explains more about these claims. A case evaluation starts with a call to (303) 209-9395 or a note through our Denver contact page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Written by CGH Injury Lawyers.

Last reviewed: September 28, 2026.

Attorney Advertising. CGH Injury Lawyers.