ClickCease
Free consultations · Se habla espanol
Lafayette, Colorado. CGH Injury Lawyers represents skiers and snowboarders injured in Colorado ski accidents.
Lafayette, Colorado

Lafayette Ski Accident Lawyers, and the 2 Emergency Doors in Town

Lafayette holds a designated Level II trauma center, and it also has a second emergency department about a mile away that carries no trauma designation at all. Which door a skier reaches shapes the medical record a claim is later built from. Boulder County keeps its ski area, its hospitals, and its courthouse inside 1 judicial district. We handle Colorado Ski Safety Act claims from our Denver office at 2701 Lawrence St., and we charge no fee unless we win.

No fee unless we win
Call (303) 209-9395 Get my free ski accident case review

It's More Than Money.

Get my free ski accident case review

100% confidential. No fee unless we win.

Our Denver Office CGH Injury Lawyers 2701 Lawrence St., Suite 201 Denver, CO 80205 (303) 209-9395 Se habla espanol
5-star rated on Google ABOTA trial advocate on the team Trial lawyers, not a settlement mill 8 attorneys, bilingual EN / ES
  • Ski injuries in Colorado answer to a specific statute before general negligence law is reached.
  • A lift injury and a fall on a run travel through different provisions, damages included.
  • A release is a contract, and a contract cannot excuse reckless or grossly negligent conduct.
  • Both paths carry a 2-year deadline set by different statutes depending on who is sued.
  • The consultation is free, and the fee is taken only out of a recovery.
The law on the mountain

What the Colorado Ski Safety Act does to a ski injury claim

Ask a lawyer about a car crash and the conversation starts with fault. Ask about a ski injury and it starts with a statute, because Colorado wrote one specifically for this sport and courts take it up before ordinary negligence. The Ski Safety Act of 1979, found at C.R.S. 33-44-101 and following, distributes duties between operator and skier and marks out a range of hazards for which no one is answerable.

The marking out happens at C.R.S. 33-44-103. Its definition of inherent dangers and risks of skiing was drafted to sweep widely: weather that changes; snow as it is and as it becomes, listing ice, hard pack, powder, crust, slush, cut-up snow, and machine-made snow; conditions on and beneath the surface, meaning bare spots, forest growth, rocks, stumps, streambeds, cliffs, extreme terrain, and trees; variations in steepness whether natural or produced by slope design, snowmaking, or grooming; and impact with lift towers, signs, posts, fences, hydrants, water pipes, and other man-made structures. Injuries falling into that range stay with the skier.

The same section then narrows itself twice, and the narrowing is what makes claims viable. Inherent dangers and risks of skiing do not include the negligence of a ski area operator as set forth at C.R.S. 33-44-104(2). And nothing in the section limits an operator's liability for injury caused by the use or operation of ski lifts.

Since unreliable summaries of the Act are common, 1 point is worth settling immediately. The statute turns on the term "ski area" and on sliding downhill or jumping on snow or ice. It does not classify resorts by the kind of skiing done there, and it establishes no helmet requirement for a skier of any age.

The critical distinction

The one question that decides most of the case

The case is largely decided by 1 early sorting. This is the line the statute draws.

Inherent dangers (no recovery)

  • Snow and ice in whatever condition, and the ground under a thin layer of it
  • The weather, and how much of the run a skier can actually see because of it
  • Terrain the mountain came with: trees, forest growth, rocks, stumps, streambeds, cliffs
  • Steepness that varies, by nature or by slope design, snowmaking, and grooming
  • Hitting a lift tower, sign, post, fence, hydrant, or water pipe that is where it should be

Operator negligence (recovery possible)

  • Lift malfunctions, poor loading, sudden stops, riders dropped, unloading injuries
  • Signage the statute requires that was absent, inaccurate, or unreadable
  • Grooming or snowmaking machinery working an open trail without the required warning
  • Unpadded or unmarked man-made obstacles inside a skiing area
  • Careless conduct by instructors, patrollers, or other resort employees

That opening classification should stay open for a while. A lift tower collision presents as inherent and changes columns entirely if the tower was missing the padding the Act requires. It is a question, and it is worth putting to somebody before the file closes around an assumption.

Skier duties and the downhill rule

Claims against another skier under C.R.S. 33-44-109

Against a fellow skier the statute reads very differently. C.R.S. 33-44-109(1) establishes that the risk of a skier-skier collision is neither an inherent risk nor a risk assumed by a skier in an action by one skier against another. The defense that ends most resort claims has been taken off the table by the legislature itself.

  1. Speed, course, and lookout

    Skiers owe a duty to control speed and course at all times and to keep a proper lookout for others and for objects. The statute then assigns the primary duty to the person skiing downhill, the skier descending from above, to avoid collision with any person or object below them. Working out who held which position on the slope is the usual battleground.

  2. Signs and closed trails

    Posted information and warnings are binding, and a run marked closed cannot be skied. The statute presumes a skier saw and understood what was posted at base area lifts, on the tramways, and on the runs being skied.

  3. Starting and joining

    Beginning from a standstill, or merging onto a run from the side, carries a duty to yield to skiers already on their way down.

  4. Devices for loose equipment

    Every ski or board must carry a strap or comparable device able to arrest it after a release. Cross country skis fall outside that rule.

  5. Impairment, and leaving a collision

    Using a lift or a trail while impaired by alcohol or a controlled substance is prohibited. So is leaving the vicinity of a collision that caused injury without first providing a name and current address to a resort employee or a patroller, with an allowance for leaving to get aid as long as the information follows.

  6. What the current penalties actually say

    The penalty subsection has been rewritten, and out-of-date reproductions remain easy to find, so this deserves care. C.R.S. 33-44-109(12)(a) makes it a civil infraction, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000, to violate the closed-trail provision, the impairment provision, or the provision on knowingly entering closed adjoining lands. C.R.S. 33-44-109(12)(b) makes leaving the scene of an injury collision a petty offense, a distinct classification that is not part of that $1,000 group.

  7. Comparative fault

    Then comes the apportionment. C.R.S. 13-21-111 allows recovery only where the claimant's negligence was not as great as that of the party sued, and cuts the award by the claimant's percentage. Once the claimant's share reaches half, the claim is over. That is the arithmetic driving an insurer's interest in getting a statement early.

The truth about waivers

How much of a claim the release actually takes

Every season pass, lift ticket, and rental form in the state carries release language, drafted to stop an injured person from going further. In practice it accomplishes less than its wording implies.

Colorado treats a release as a contract and applies contract principles to it. The terms have to be clear and unambiguous, and they extend no further than the conduct they describe. Language written to cover ordinary negligence covers ordinary negligence.

The exclusions are the working part of the analysis. Willful and wanton conduct, recklessness, and gross negligence are beyond the reach of any release. Where a resort knew of a hazard and left it in place, passed on an inspection it was required to perform, or continued operating equipment it knew was defective, the release will not carry the weight being put on it.

Minors are handled by a separate provision. C.R.S. 13-22-107(3) allows a parent to release or waive a child's prospective negligence claim on the child's behalf, and subsection (4) states that nothing in the section permits a parent to waive a child's claim for a willful and wanton act or omission, a reckless act or omission, or a grossly negligent act or omission.

The usual error is reading the paperwork by itself and deciding there is nothing to do. Bring it in and have it read alongside the facts.

Local Knowledge

Two emergency departments, and only one of them is designated

Trauma Care

The difference between the 2 doors on the map

Lafayette holds a designated Level II trauma center: Intermountain Health Good Samaritan Hospital, 200 Exempla Circle. On the state health department's designated facility list it carries a Level II designation, as does Foothills Hospital on Arapahoe Avenue in Boulder.

The city also has a second emergency department, Community Medical Center Emergency Department at 1000 W. South Boulder Road, which is not a designated trauma facility.

Both are emergency care. They are not the same thing for a badly injured skier. A Level II designation describes a hospital with the surgical and specialty coverage to provide definitive care for major trauma. A non-designated emergency department treats emergencies, and a patient whose injuries call for a designated trauma center gets transferred to one.

For a claim, the distinction shows up in the records. A patient stabilized at 1 facility and moved to another generates a transport record, an arrival assessment at the second hospital, and 2 separate charts under 2 separate release processes. Those files also usually contain the earliest independent description of how badly hurt someone was, which is why the sequence gets reconstructed in full instead of summarized.

Trauma Care

Boulder County keeps most of the pieces in 1 place

Boulder County belongs to the 20th Judicial District, and unlike neighboring counties it shares that district with no one. District matters go to the Boulder County Justice Center, 1777 6th Street in Boulder, with a second location at 1035 Kimbark Street in Longmont.

Boulder County also contains a ski area, Eldora, reached from Lafayette by heading west through Boulder and up Boulder Canyon on SH-119 past Nederland. That combination matters here. A Lafayette skier hurt at Eldora can have the injury, the treating hospital, and the courthouse all inside Boulder County and inside the 20th Judicial District, while Adams, Arapahoe, Douglas, and Jefferson counties contain no ski area at all.

Boulder County holds 5 designated trauma facilities across 4 cities and 2 levels: Good Samaritan here in Lafayette and Foothills in Boulder at Level II, and AdventHealth Avista in Louisville, Longmont United, and Longs Peak in Longmont at Level III. Level I care, which a catastrophic injury may require, is outside the county in every direction.

Courthouse

The other direction from town

Not every trip from Lafayette goes up Boulder Canyon. Skiers heading for the I-70 corridor leave the county entirely and end up in Clear Creek County, which sits in the 5th Judicial District along with Summit, Eagle, and Lake counties. The same household can take 2 different roads on 2 weekends and produce claims in 2 different judicial districts.

Venue

Where the claim itself goes

Venue in these cases generally follows the resort and the location of the injury. That is what separates the Eldora case from the rest: the claim can stay in the county where the client lives. A crash at a resort along I-70 will normally be litigated in the mountain county where it happened, no matter that the injured skier drove home to Lafayette that night.

Compensation

What an injured Lafayette skier may be able to recover

Once negligence is established, Colorado separates losses that come with documentation from those that do not.

Economic damages

  • Removal from the mountain, air transport included where it was needed
  • Emergency care, surgery, and specialist treatment through discharge
  • Wages lost in recovery, and earning capacity lost after it
  • Physical and occupational rehabilitation
  • Care still to come, with a life care plan where the injury supports one
  • Out-of-pocket costs traceable to the injury

Non-economic damages

  • Pain and suffering following orthopedic, spinal, or head injuries
  • Permanent impairment, or function that never fully returns
  • Loss of enjoyment of life, the sport among the losses
  • In a death case, funeral expenses and the loss of companionship

The operator cap, and the lift exception inside it

What a ski area operator can be made to pay is capped by statute. C.R.S. 33-44-113 fixes a total ceiling of $1,000,000 present value, limits a derivative claim by another claimant to $250,000, and limits non-economic loss to $250,000. Four elements of the section govern how it applies.

  • Injuries occurring to a passenger while riding on a passenger tramway are excluded from the cap by the statute's own language, and a chairlift case is therefore analyzed apart from an injury on the snow.
  • The cap binds operators. It does not reach a claim against the skier who caused a collision.
  • On good cause shown a court may award above the ceiling, limited to excess future lost earnings or excess future medical and other health-care costs, and only where the limit would be unfair.
  • The limits and the exceptions to them are not disclosed to the jury.
Deadlines and fault

Two years, from whichever statute fits the defendant

Two years applies either way. The source of the 2 years shifts with the identity of the defendant.

Where a ski area operator or its employees are sued and the damages arose from the maintenance, supervision, or operation of a passenger tramway or a ski area, C.R.S. 33-44-111 applies and the action must be brought within 2 years after the claim for relief arises. Its language is directed at operators, so it does not govern a suit against another skier. That deadline comes from C.R.S. 13-80-102(1)(a), the general 2-year period for tort actions.

The start date is fixed by its own provision. C.R.S. 13-80-108(1) provides that a cause of action accrues on the date both the injury and its cause are known or should have been known through reasonable diligence. In the typical ski crash that is the day of the crash. The discovery language exists because certain injuries, head and spine injuries especially, surface over time. Waiting to see the full extent of the damage does not add time to the deadline.

Fault is assessed on its own terms. C.R.S. 13-21-111 permits recovery while the claimant's negligence remains below that of the party sued, reduces the award by the claimant's share, and ends recovery at an even split. Insurers are well aware of that boundary, and the account that keeps a claimant clear of it is built from witnesses and records in the first weeks.

Why CGH

Why injured Lafayette skiers choose CGH Injury Lawyers

Trial-Ready

Built for trial.

A file that visibly belongs in a courtroom is valued differently from one that does not.

The Statute

Ski claims run on their own rules.

Inherent risk, the duties in 33-44-109, the operator cap, and release language behave nothing like ordinary negligence.

Fast Evidence Action

Proof expires.

Lift maintenance logs, grooming records, incident reports, patrol notes, and the state of signage all change or disappear. Preservation demands go out early.

No Win, No Fee

No fee unless we win.

Nothing is owed for the consultation, and the fee comes from a recovery. Case costs are addressed in the fee agreement before signing.

Local Reach

The care chain gets reconstructed.

Where a patient was first treated, whether they were transferred, and what each facility recorded on arrival are established from the records, not from memory.

How it works

How we handle a Lafayette ski accident case

  1. Free consultation.

    Explain what happened and get a straight answer about whether a claim exists, including when the answer is no.

  2. Preservation.

    Written demands go to the resort for lift logs, grooming records, incident reports, and video before retention periods run out.

  3. Investigation.

    Witnesses are located, patrol and clinic records are obtained, and where the mechanism of injury is disputed an accident reconstruction expert is retained.

  4. Medical picture.

    Records are collected from every facility in the chain, and in serious cases treating physicians and life care planners set out what recovery demands.

  5. Demand and negotiation.

    The claim goes out supported by the evidence.

  6. Litigation where needed.

    Where the offer does not match the harm, suit is filed in the correct venue and the case is prepared for trial.

5-star rated on Google

I wish I could leave more than 5 stars!

Grace Macaluso, 5-star Google review
Questions

Lafayette ski accident, frequently asked questions

Is there a trauma center in Lafayette?

Yes. Intermountain Health Good Samaritan Hospital at 200 Exempla Circle is designated Level II on the state health department's list. Foothills Hospital in Boulder carries the same designation.

What about the other emergency room in town?

Community Medical Center Emergency Department at 1000 W. South Boulder Road is an emergency department that is not a designated trauma facility. It treats emergencies, and a patient whose injuries call for a designated trauma center is transferred to one.

Why does the difference matter to my case?

Because it shapes the record. A transfer produces a transport record, a second arrival assessment, and 2 charts held by 2 institutions with separate release procedures. Reconstructing that sequence is how the severity of an injury gets demonstrated instead of asserted.

Which judicial district is Lafayette in?

The 20th, which covers Boulder County alone. District matters are handled at the Boulder County Justice Center, 1777 6th Street in Boulder, with a second location at 1035 Kimbark Street in Longmont.

I was hurt at Eldora. Where does that case go?

Eldora is in Boulder County, reached through Boulder Canyon on SH-119 past Nederland, so the injury, the treating hospital, and the courthouse can all sit in Boulder County and the 20th Judicial District. Most Front Range counties contain no ski area, so their residents do not have that option.

I was hurt at a resort on I-70 instead. Does that change things?

Yes. Those resorts are outside Boulder County, and the ones closest along that corridor are in Clear Creek County, which is in the 5th Judicial District with Summit, Eagle, and Lake counties. Venue generally follows the place of injury.

Does the release on my pass end my claim?

Not by itself. Colorado reads a release as a contract, so it reaches only the conduct it clearly names. It cannot cover willful and wanton conduct, recklessness, or gross negligence, and under C.R.S. 13-22-107(4) a parent cannot waive a child's claim for conduct in those categories.

Another skier hit me. Is that just part of the sport?

Not in a claim between skiers. C.R.S. 33-44-109(1) provides that a skier-skier collision is neither an inherent risk nor a risk assumed in an action by one skier against another, and the statute places the primary duty on the person skiing downhill, the skier coming from above, to avoid people and objects below them.

I was hurt on a chairlift. Is that treated differently?

It can be. C.R.S. 33-44-103 provides that nothing in the inherent-risk definition limits an operator's liability for injury caused by the use or operation of ski lifts, and C.R.S. 33-44-113 excludes injuries occurring to a passenger while riding on a passenger tramway from the damages cap.

How long do I have?

2 years. Against a ski area operator or its employees the deadline comes from C.R.S. 33-44-111, and against another skier from C.R.S. 13-80-102(1)(a). The period generally begins once both the injury and its cause were known or reasonably should have been known.

Is there a cap on what I can recover?

Against a ski area operator, yes. C.R.S. 33-44-113 sets $1,000,000 present value overall, with $250,000 on derivative claims and on non-economic loss. Passenger tramway injuries are excluded, the cap does not apply to a claim against another skier, and a court may exceed it on good cause shown for excess future earnings or future medical costs.

Where would I go for the most serious injuries?

Boulder County's designated centers top out at Level II. Level I care is outside the county, and where a patient is taken depends on the injury, the transport available, and the decisions made by the treating clinicians at the time.

Do I have to wear a helmet in Colorado?

The Ski Safety Act imposes no helmet requirement at any age. Wearing one is sensible, and it is not what decides whether a claim exists.

What if I was partly at fault?

Recovery remains available while your negligence stays below the other party's, with the award reduced by your share. At half or more, C.R.S. 13-21-111 ends recovery, which is why the first account of fault is worth challenging.

What will this cost me?

Nothing to start. The consultation is free and the fee is taken only from a recovery. How case costs are handled is set out in the fee agreement before you sign.

Keep Reading

Related pages

Lafayette

Practice Area

Firm

Get Help

It's More Than Money.

You were hurt on the mountain. We handle everything else.

Call (303) 209-9395 or request a free case review. No fee unless we win.

Call (303) 209-9395 Get my free ski accident case review

Prefer to read first? See how Colorado's Ski Safety Act works.

CGH Injury Lawyers · 2701 Lawrence St., Suite 201, Denver, CO 80205

Attorney Advertising. CGH Injury Lawyers.