ClickCease
Free consultations · Se habla espanol
Westminster, Colorado. CGH Injury Lawyers represents ski accident victims from Westminster from our Denver office.
Westminster, Colorado

Westminster Ski Accident Lawyers, Across Two County Lines

Westminster sits in 2 counties. The Adams County side is in the 17th Judicial District and the Jefferson County side is in the 1st, so 2 households on opposite ends of the same city answer to different courts. The designated trauma center with a Westminster address is in a third county again. Sorting out which line an address falls on is early work in any claim. We handle Colorado Ski Safety Act claims from our Denver office at 2701 Lawrence St., and we charge no fee unless we win.

No fee unless we win
Call (303) 209-9395 Get my free ski accident case review

It's More Than Money.

Get my free ski accident case review

100% confidential. No fee unless we win.

Our Denver Office CGH Injury Lawyers 2701 Lawrence St., Suite 201 Denver, CO 80205 (303) 209-9395 Se habla espanol
5-star rated on Google ABOTA trial advocate on the team Trial lawyers, not a settlement mill 8 attorneys, bilingual EN / ES
  • Colorado decides ski injuries under a purpose-written statute before ordinary negligence applies.
  • Injuries on a lift and injuries on the snow are governed by different provisions, damages included.
  • The release on a pass is a contract, and no contract covers reckless or grossly negligent conduct.
  • Both routes carry a 2-year deadline, drawn from different statutes depending on the defendant.
  • The consultation is free, and our fee comes only from a recovery.
The law on the mountain

What the Colorado Ski Safety Act does to a ski injury claim

Bring most injuries to a lawyer and the first question is whether somebody failed to take care. Bring a ski injury and a prior question applies, because Colorado wrote a statute for this activity and courts reach it first. The Ski Safety Act of 1979, C.R.S. 33-44-101 and following, allocates duties to the resort, allocates duties to the skier, and marks out a set of hazards that supports no claim against anybody.

That set sits at C.R.S. 33-44-103, in a definition drafted to reach a great deal. Weather that changes. Snow in each of its conditions, ice, hard pack, powder, crust, slush, cut-up snow, and machine-made snow. Surface and subsurface conditions, meaning bare spots, forest growth, rocks, stumps, streambeds, cliffs, extreme terrain, and trees. Variation in steepness, whether natural or the result of slope design, snowmaking, and grooming. Impact with lift towers, signs, posts, fences, hydrants, water pipes, and other man-made structures. An injury falling inside that set is the skier's own.

The definition then confines itself in 2 respects, and those confinements are what make claims possible. Inherent dangers and risks of skiing do not include the negligence of a ski area operator as set forth at C.R.S. 33-44-104(2). And nothing in the section limits an operator's liability for injury caused by the use or operation of ski lifts.

Worth correcting early, because poor summaries of this Act are widely available. The statute is founded on the term "ski area" and on sliding downhill or jumping on snow or ice. It does not categorize resorts by type of skiing, and it sets no helmet requirement for a skier at any age.

The critical distinction

The one question that decides most of the case

Most of the outcome is settled by one early call. Here is how the statute divides the ground.

Inherent dangers (no recovery)

  • Snow and ice in any condition, and the ground beneath where cover is thin
  • Weather, including its effect on visibility
  • Features the mountain came with: rocks, stumps, streambeds, cliffs, forest growth, and trees
  • Pitch that varies, naturally or through slope design, snowmaking, or grooming
  • Contact with a lift tower, sign, post, fence, hydrant, or water pipe in its normal position

Operator negligence (recovery possible)

  • Lift malfunctions, mishandled loading, abrupt stops, drops, and unloading injuries
  • Signage the Act requires that was absent, incorrect, or unreadable
  • Grooming or snowmaking machinery operating on an open trail without the required warning
  • Man-made obstacles left unpadded or unmarked in a skiing area
  • Negligent conduct by resort staff, instructors, or patrollers

That first classification should be held provisionally. A lift tower strike appears inherent on its face and shifts to the second column if the padding required on that tower was not in place. The question is worth asking before anyone settles on a conclusion.

Skier duties and the downhill rule

Claims against another skier under C.R.S. 33-44-109

Where another skier caused the injury, the statute operates in the injured person's favor. C.R.S. 33-44-109(1) provides that the risk of a skier-skier collision is neither an inherent risk nor a risk assumed by a skier in an action by one skier against another. The defense that ends most claims against a resort is closed off here by the legislature's own language.

  1. Speed, course, and lookout

    Each skier has a duty to maintain control of speed and course at all times and to keep a proper lookout for others. The statute then places the primary duty on the person skiing downhill, the skier descending from above, to avoid colliding with any person or object below them. Reconstructing who was in which position is usually where the dispute lives.

  2. Signs and closed trails

    Posted information and warnings must be obeyed, and a trail posted as closed cannot be skied. A skier is presumed to have seen and understood what was posted near base area lifts, on the tramways, and on the trails being skied.

  3. Starting and joining

    Setting off from a stationary position, or entering a trail from the side, brings a duty to avoid the skiers already coming down.

  4. Devices for loose equipment

    Every ski or board must have a strap or other device capable of stopping it if it comes off. Cross country skis are excluded from that requirement.

  5. Impairment, and leaving a collision

    Moving uphill on a lift or using a trail while impaired by alcohol or a controlled substance is prohibited, as is leaving the vicinity of an injury collision without giving your name and current address to a resort employee or patroller. A departure to secure aid is permitted, provided the information follows.

  6. What the current penalties actually say

    This subsection was rewritten, and older reproductions still print the superseded wording, so it repays attention. C.R.S. 33-44-109(12)(a) makes it a civil infraction, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000, to violate the closed-trail provision, the impairment provision, or the provision on knowingly entering closed adjoining lands. C.R.S. 33-44-109(12)(b) makes leaving the scene of an injury collision a petty offense, a separate classification that sits outside that $1,000 group.

  7. Comparative fault

    Colorado then divides responsibility. C.R.S. 13-21-111 lets a claimant recover only where their negligence was not as great as the negligence of the party sued, and reduces the award by the claimant's share. Once that share reaches half, the claim ends. That is the arithmetic behind an insurer's interest in establishing the story early.

The truth about waivers

How much of a claim the release actually takes

Every pass, ticket, and rental form in Colorado carries release language, written to stop an injured person before they begin. It usually does less than its tone implies.

Colorado treats a release as a contract, so contract law applies to it. The wording must be clear and unambiguous, and it reaches only the conduct it names. A clause written against ordinary negligence covers ordinary negligence and goes no further.

The limits are the operative part. Willful and wanton conduct, recklessness, and gross negligence lie outside any release. Where a resort knew about a hazard and left it in place, skipped an inspection it was obliged to perform, or kept equipment running while aware it was defective, the document does not do the work the resort is relying on it to do.

Children fall under a distinct rule. C.R.S. 13-22-107(3) permits a parent to release or waive a child's prospective negligence claim on the child's behalf, and subsection (4) provides that nothing in the section permits a parent to waive a child's claim for a willful and wanton act or omission, a reckless act or omission, or a grossly negligent act or omission.

Reading the form on its own and concluding nothing can be done is the frequent mistake. Bring it in, and it gets read against what happened.

Local Knowledge

One city, two counties, and a hospital in a third

Courthouse

Which side of Westminster you live on changes the court

Westminster spans Adams County and Jefferson County, and those counties belong to different judicial districts. The 2 courthouses are in opposite directions from the city, one northeast and one southwest. For anyone dealing with a local matter alongside an injury claim, confirming which county an address actually sits in is not a formality. It determines where filings go and which court records are relevant.

  • The Adams County portion is in the 17th Judicial District, which Adams County shares with the City and County of Broomfield. District matters are handled at the Adams County Justice Center, 1100 Judicial Center Drive, Brighton.
  • The Jefferson County portion is in the 1st Judicial District, which Jefferson County shares with Gilpin County. District matters are handled at the Jefferson Combined Court, 100 Jefferson County Parkway, Golden.

Trauma Care

The nearest designated trauma center is in Broomfield County

St. Anthony North Hospital, 14300 Orchard Parkway, carries a Westminster mailing address and is a designated Level III trauma center. On the state health department's designated facility list, the county recorded for that hospital is Broomfield. So a Westminster resident can live in Adams County, be treated at a hospital with a Westminster address that the state records in Broomfield County, and have a ski claim that belongs in a mountain county entirely. Three different counties touch a single case, none of which is inherently the wrong answer. It simply has to be untangled at the beginning instead of assumed. A Level III facility is built to evaluate, stabilize, and transfer a patient onward when the injury calls for a higher level of care. Adams County also holds a Level II at HCA HealthONE Mountain Ridge in Thornton and a Level I at UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital on the Anschutz campus, and Jefferson County holds a Level I at St. Anthony Hospital in Lakewood and a Level II at Intermountain Health Lutheran Hospital in Golden. A seriously injured skier may pass through more than one of these. The consequence for a claim is a record spread across institutions. Patrol documentation at the resort, a first hospital near the mountain, a transport, a receiving hospital on the Front Range, then follow-up care. Each holds its own file and releases it on its own schedule. Assembling that chain is routine work, and it is what demonstrates the severity of an injury instead of asserting it.

The Corridor

Where the claim itself goes

Venue in these cases generally follows the resort and the location of the injury. Neither Adams County nor Jefferson County contains a ski area, so a Westminster claim is normally litigated in the mountain county where the crash occurred. Jefferson County's partner in the 1st Judicial District, Gilpin County, sits in the canyon country west of here, and the ski areas nearest the metro are in Clear Creek County, which belongs to the 5th Judicial District along with Summit, Eagle, and Lake counties. Westminster's position along US-36 and I-25 means residents reach the mountains by several different routes, and which one they took can matter. A trip that goes through Boulder Canyon ends in a different county from one that goes up I-70, and the county at the end of the drive is the one that generally decides where a claim belongs.

Compensation

What an injured Westminster skier may be able to recover

Once negligence is established, Colorado sorts losses into those supported by documents and those that are not.

Economic damages

  • Removal from the mountain, air transport included where it was required
  • Emergency care, surgery, and specialist treatment through discharge
  • Wages lost during recovery, and earning capacity lost afterward
  • Physical and occupational rehabilitation
  • Care yet to come, including a life care plan where the injury justifies one
  • Out-of-pocket costs attributable to the injury

Non-economic damages

  • Pain and suffering after orthopedic, spinal, or head trauma
  • Permanent impairment, or lost physical function
  • Loss of enjoyment of life, including the sport
  • In a death case, funeral expenses and the loss of companionship

The operator cap, and the lift exception inside it

The amount recoverable from a ski area operator is limited by statute. C.R.S. 33-44-113 sets a total ceiling of $1,000,000 present value, caps any derivative claim by another claimant at $250,000, and caps non-economic loss at $250,000. Four features of the section shape how it applies.

  • Injuries occurring to a passenger while riding on a passenger tramway are excluded from the cap by the statute's own terms, which is why a chairlift case is analyzed separately from an injury on the snow.
  • The cap applies to claims against an operator only. A claim against the skier who caused a collision is outside it.
  • A court may award above the ceiling on good cause shown, limited to excess future lost earnings or excess future medical and other health-care costs, and only where applying the limit would be unfair.
  • The limits and the exceptions to them are not disclosed to the jury.
Deadlines and fault

Two years, from whichever statute fits the defendant

Both paths run 2 years. The statute providing the period depends on who is being sued.

Against a ski area operator or its employees, where the damages were caused by the maintenance, supervision, or operation of a passenger tramway or a ski area, C.R.S. 33-44-111 applies and requires the action to be brought within 2 years after the claim for relief arises. Against another skier that section is inapplicable, since its language addresses operators. The limitation there is C.R.S. 13-80-102(1)(a), the general 2-year period for tort actions.

The starting point has its own rule. C.R.S. 13-80-108(1) provides that a cause of action accrues on the date both the injury and its cause are known or should have been known through reasonable diligence. For most ski crashes that is the day it happened. Injuries that surface gradually, which covers a good deal of head and spine trauma, are why the provision is written in those terms. Waiting to see how serious the damage becomes does not extend the period.

Fault is assessed separately. C.R.S. 13-21-111 allows recovery while the claimant's negligence remains below that of the party sued, reduces the award in proportion to the claimant's share, and ends recovery at an even split. That threshold is well known to insurers, and the account of a collision that keeps a claimant clear of it is assembled from witnesses and records in the first weeks.

Why CGH

Why injured Westminster skiers choose CGH Injury Lawyers

Trial-Ready

Built for trial.

A file that is visibly ready for a courtroom is valued differently from one that is not.

The Statute

Ski claims run on their own rules.

Inherent risk, statutory duties, the operator cap, and release language do not behave like ordinary negligence.

Fast Evidence Action

Proof expires.

Lift maintenance logs, grooming records, incident reports, patrol notes, and the state of signage all change or disappear. Preservation demands need to go out early.

No Win, No Fee

No fee unless we win.

Nothing is owed for the consultation, and our fee comes from a recovery. The fee agreement sets out how case costs are handled before you sign.

Local Reach

County lines get confirmed, not assumed.

A Westminster address can sit in Adams County or Jefferson County, in 2 different judicial districts, and that gets established at the start.

How it works

How we handle a Westminster ski accident case

  1. Free consultation

    Tell us what happened and get a straight answer on whether there is a claim, including when the answer is that there is not.

  2. Preservation

    Written demands go to the resort for lift logs, grooming records, incident reports, and video before retention periods run.

  3. Investigation

    Witnesses are located, patrol and clinic records obtained, and where the mechanism of injury is contested, an accident reconstruction expert is brought in.

  4. Medical picture

    Records are collected from every facility in the chain, and in serious cases treating physicians and life care planners establish what recovery requires.

  5. Demand and negotiation

    The claim goes out backed by evidence.

  6. Litigation where needed

    Where the offer does not match the harm, suit is filed in the correct venue and the case is worked up for trial.

5-star rated on Google

I wish I could leave more than 5 stars!

Grace Macaluso, 5-star Google review
Questions

Westminster ski accident, frequently asked questions

Which judicial district is Westminster in?

It depends on which county your address falls in. Westminster spans Adams County, which is the 17th Judicial District with Broomfield, and Jefferson County, which is the 1st Judicial District with Gilpin County. Adams County matters are handled at the Adams County Justice Center, 1100 Judicial Center Drive, in Brighton, and Jefferson County matters at the Jefferson Combined Court, 100 Jefferson County Parkway, in Golden.

How do I know which county I live in?

It is worth confirming with the county assessor or your property records instead of assuming from the mailing address. Westminster addresses appear on both sides of the line, and the answer changes which court handles a local matter.

My hospital has a Westminster address. Is it in Westminster's county?

Not necessarily. St. Anthony North Hospital on Orchard Parkway carries a Westminster address and is a designated Level III trauma center, and the state's designated facility list records its county as Broomfield. That is normal for addresses near a county line and it does not affect your care or your claim.

My accident was at a resort. Will it be heard in Adams or Jefferson County?

Usually neither. Venue generally follows the resort and the site of the injury, and there is no ski area in either county, so the claim is normally litigated in the mountain county where the crash happened.

What trauma care is nearby?

St. Anthony North on Orchard Parkway is designated Level III. Adams County also has a Level II at HCA HealthONE Mountain Ridge in Thornton and a Level I at UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital on the Anschutz campus, and Jefferson County has a Level I at St. Anthony Hospital in Lakewood and a Level II at Lutheran Hospital in Golden.

Does the release on my pass end my claim?

Not on its own. Colorado reads a release as a contract, so it reaches only the conduct it clearly describes. It cannot cover willful and wanton conduct, recklessness, or gross negligence, and under C.R.S. 13-22-107(4) a parent cannot waive a child's claim for conduct in those categories.

Another skier hit me. Is that just part of the sport?

Not in a claim between skiers. C.R.S. 33-44-109(1) provides that a skier-skier collision is neither an inherent risk nor a risk assumed in an action by one skier against another, and the statute places the primary duty to avoid the collision on the person skiing downhill, the skier who is above.

I was hurt on a chairlift. Is that treated differently?

It can be. C.R.S. 33-44-103 states that nothing in the inherent-risk definition limits an operator's liability for injury caused by the use or operation of ski lifts, and C.R.S. 33-44-113 excludes injuries occurring to a passenger while riding on a passenger tramway from the damages cap.

How long do I have?

2 years. Against a ski area operator or its employees the deadline comes from C.R.S. 33-44-111, and against another skier from C.R.S. 13-80-102(1)(a). The period generally starts when both the injury and its cause were known or reasonably should have been known.

Is there a cap on what I can recover?

Against a ski area operator, yes. C.R.S. 33-44-113 sets $1,000,000 present value overall, with $250,000 on derivative claims and on non-economic loss. Passenger tramway injuries are excluded, the cap does not apply to a claim against another skier, and a court may exceed it on good cause shown for excess future earnings or future medical costs.

Do I have to wear a helmet in Colorado?

The Ski Safety Act imposes no helmet requirement at any age. Wearing one is sensible, and it is not what decides whether a claim exists.

What if I was partly at fault?

Recovery is still available while your negligence stays below the other party's, with the award reduced by your share. At half or more, C.R.S. 13-21-111 ends recovery, which is why the early account of fault is worth challenging.

What will this cost me?

Nothing to start. The consultation is free, and the fee is taken only from a recovery. How case costs are handled is set out in the fee agreement before you sign.

Keep Reading

Related pages

Westminster

Practice Area

Firm

Get Help

It's More Than Money.

You were hurt on the mountain. We handle everything else.

Call (303) 209-9395 or request a free case review. No fee unless we win.

Tell us what happened

100% confidential. No fee unless we win.

Call (303) 209-9395 Get my free ski accident case review

Prefer to read first? See how Colorado's Ski Safety Act works.

CGH Injury Lawyers · 2701 Lawrence St., Suite 201, Denver, CO 80205

Attorney Advertising. CGH Injury Lawyers.